Hello!
for jpg I use:
convert ^
-quality 90 ^
-filter Lanczos ^
-sampling-factor 4:4:0 ^
-define jpeg:dct-method=float ^
for webp I use:
convert ^
-quality 60 ^
-define webp:lossless=false ^
Tell me, what parameters should I use for jpg and webp? can i miss something? I need better quality for the photo
webp and jpg - parameters for high-quality photos
-
snibgo
- Posts: 12159
- Joined: 2010-01-23T23:01:33-07:00
- Authentication code: 1151
- Location: England, UK
- Contact:
Re: webp and jpg - parameters for high-quality photos
What is wrong with the quality? Why not use "-quality 100"?caho wrote:I need better quality for the photo
JPG is 8 bits/channel/pixel, and is lossy (it changes pixel values). For best quality, don't use JPG.
I don't use WEBP and can't advise on it.
snibgo's IM pages: im.snibgo.com
Re: webp and jpg - parameters for high-quality photos
I need to use jpg and webp. need to.
I can set the quality to 100. But there are other parameters. I do not know what to exhibit there.
filter Lanczos? or is there a better option?
sampling-factor 4:4:0? or is there a better option?
and webp?
- fmw42
- Posts: 25562
- Joined: 2007-07-02T17:14:51-07:00
- Authentication code: 1152
- Location: Sunnyvale, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: webp and jpg - parameters for high-quality photos
You have not given full command lines for your processing. -filter lanczos does nothing unless you are resizing the image. Sorry, I am not an expert on jpg or webp arguments. And results may depend upon the input image. Perhaps you should try experimenting to see what gives you the best results.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 26 guests