The inconsistency in previous tests was a result of my EC2 credits running out and CPU being throttled. The performance of convert -annotate directly on the large images was still unacceptable for my application so I am now using this command to create the composite:
convert INPUT.png \( -size ...
Search found 3 matches
- 2017-09-26T16:31:16-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Poor performance of convert --annotate on high resolution images
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5438
- 2017-09-26T00:15:55-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Poor performance of convert --annotate on high resolution images
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5438
Re: Poor performance of convert --annotate on high resolution images
You know what - now that I am redoing these tests in a clean environment I am finding that the composite workaround DOES improve the speed significantly as expected. Here are the commands I am running with the run times:
Annotation directly on original image:
time convert INPUT.png -quality 100 ...
Annotation directly on original image:
time convert INPUT.png -quality 100 ...
- 2017-09-25T22:42:21-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Poor performance of convert --annotate on high resolution images
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5438
Poor performance of convert --annotate on high resolution images
Hello,
I am trying to annotate a stream of very high resolution images that are typically 5000x5000px. I am finding that this operation is using up a lot of system resources and annotating a single image can take a long time. Is this expected behavior for what should be (at least in my mind) a ...
I am trying to annotate a stream of very high resolution images that are typically 5000x5000px. I am finding that this operation is using up a lot of system resources and annotating a single image can take a long time. Is this expected behavior for what should be (at least in my mind) a ...