Thanks. Now I have this bug in my version.
http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=22119
I'll have to upgrade. But no problem, I can use -quality 9.
I wonder if the docs should reflect you don't need 2 digits in the quality setting or maybe that is an unintended result when ...
Search found 2 matches
- 2013-09-21T21:21:54-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Incorrect png -quality 9 setting gives the best compression
- Replies: 5
- Views: 30674
- 2013-09-21T16:02:53-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Incorrect png -quality 9 setting gives the best compression
- Replies: 5
- Views: 30674
Incorrect png -quality 9 setting gives the best compression
If I use -quality 9 I get extraordinary compression but the docs don't specify what is mogrify's behaviour with such input value so I don't know if I'm getting a valid result.
I have 26 TIFF images for testing, some 8 bit greyscale, some 24 bit color.
If I compress using the default quality (which ...
I have 26 TIFF images for testing, some 8 bit greyscale, some 24 bit color.
If I compress using the default quality (which ...