I'm also trying with the 6.8.8-4.
When I ran .configure to generate the spec file, ./configure produced this output:
Magick++ --with-magick-plus-plus=no no
Nevertheless, the Magick++ packages and code were still in the spec file.
I manually removed all references to Magick++ from the spec file ...
Search found 3 matches
- 2014-02-08T15:11:00-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Configure switch --without-magic-plus-plus ignored?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4867
- 2014-02-08T10:56:27-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Configure switch --without-magic-plus-plus ignored?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4867
Configure switch --without-magic-plus-plus ignored?
I'm trying to build a bare bones ImageMagick rpm.
I've tried building with "--without-magick-plus-plus" and "--with-magick-plus-plus=no".
Either way it looks like Magick++ is still getting built:
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/bin/Magick++-config
/usr/include ...
I've tried building with "--without-magick-plus-plus" and "--with-magick-plus-plus=no".
Either way it looks like Magick++ is still getting built:
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/bin/Magick++-config
/usr/include ...
- 2013-05-22T07:36:05-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: RPM dependency differences 32bit vs. 64bit
- Replies: 0
- Views: 6294
RPM dependency differences 32bit vs. 64bit
I've been installing ImageMagick on a few servers and I noticed that the 32bit and 64bit rpms for RedHat/CentOS have different dependencies.
For example, the 64bit version requires libHalf.so.4 and the 32bit version does not.
Does anyone know why this is?
# rpm -qpR ImageMagick-6.8.5-7.i386 ...
For example, the 64bit version requires libHalf.so.4 and the 32bit version does not.
Does anyone know why this is?
# rpm -qpR ImageMagick-6.8.5-7.i386 ...